Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brandon Walkin vs Gal Emersic Potocnik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Walkin vs Potocnik analysis and find out who is favored!
Brandon Walkin vs Gal Emersic Potocnik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Walkin 1 - 0 Potocnik
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Walkin has won 41.03% of points on their second serve, while Potocnik has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Walkin, in recent form, has won 44.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Potocnik has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.63% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Walkin has saved 53.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Potocnik has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Walkin has won 35% of matches played (W/L 7/ 13), with Potocnik winning 43.75% (W/L 7/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Walkin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 77/ 71), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Potocnik has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 15/ 23), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Walkin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 6/ 9), where as Potocnik has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.75% of matches (W/L 7/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Walkin winning 1 times and Potocnik being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Walkin winning 2 and Potocnik winning 0. The last match between Walkin and Potocnik was at the M25 Kiseljak, 30-05-2023, Q3, Clay with Brandon Walkin getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Walkin and Potocnik have played a deciding set 0 times, with Walkin winning 0 times and Potocnik 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Walkin winning 0, and Potocnik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Walkin has played against opponents with an average rank of 167.9 while Potocnik has played against players with an average rank of 163.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Walkin has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Potocnik has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Walkin has converted 45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Potocnik has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
825
Rank
702
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
50% (119-117)
Career Total W/L
38% (22-36)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brandon Walkin | Gal Emersic Potocnik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (31/47) | 54% (38/70) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (25/31) | 63% (24/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 34% (11/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (35/70) | 28% (13/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Brandon Walkin
Player
Gal Emersic Potocnik
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brandon Walkin | Gal Emersic Potocnik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 20% (2/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (39/54) | 44% (15/19) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:31 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 147.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (177/294) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (120/177) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (48/117) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (9/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (96/283) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Brandon Walkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sam Ryan Ziegann
Player
Brandon Walkin
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Corey Gaal
Player
Brandon Walkin
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Brandon Walkin
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Tomislav Edward Papac
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Brandon Walkin
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Brandon Walkin
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve %
80%
(
16 of
20)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
3 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
28
Total Points Won
12
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kody Pearson
Player
Brandon Walkin
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Brandon Walkin
69%
(
74 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
76 of
115)
2
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
57 of
74)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
53 of
76)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
33 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
45 of
115)
119
Total Points Won
103
|
6-1 6-7(5) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Issei Okamura
68%
(
68 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
13
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Walkin
Player
Geni Inoue
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gal Emersic Potocnik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Basic
Player
Gal Emersic Potocnik
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Gal Emersic Potocnik
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gal Emersic Potocnik
Player
Adam Gabor Szoke
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
5
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
0
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gal Emersic Potocnik
Player
Tilen Kovac
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Walkin Vs Potocnik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
